With military and financial support from the United States to the tune of nearly 12 billion dollars, the out-of-control extremist rogue state of Israel is poised to attack the sovereign nation of Iran under the pretext that Iran has the capability—not the possession but the
Thank you for an excellent article detailing the truth about how America under Obama/evil Hilary Clinton massacred 1 million Iraqis and murdered a the most loved African leader, Gaddafi and completely destroyed the sovereign country of lybia. As long as the two war-mongers the US and Israel under Netanayu exist, there will never be peace and prosperity in Africa. Dr Rapiti
Thanks for your comment and accurate assessment regarding peace, which never seems to be the goal for America and their NATO allies.
In his opening statement at the United Nations, Muammar Gaddafi was gracious enough to congratulate and welcome Obama to the General Assembly, acknowledging his African heritage and referring to him as “our son.” Two years later Obama—a bonified globalist stooge—ordered an attack on the sovereign nation of Libya. The rest, as they say, is history.
Gaddafi’s exact words:
“In the name of the General Assembly, at its 64th session, presided over by Libya of the African Union, of 1,000 traditional African kingdoms, and in my own name, I would like to take this opportunity as President of the African Union to congratulate our son Obama because he is attending the General Assembly, and we welcome him as his country is hosting this meeting.”
Make that 3 million Iraqis. At least. Not counting the maimed, bereaved, and those rendered homeless and stateless. Or the almost total destruction of the infrastructure.
I fear that "we" as a species are killer apes. I mean that literally. In small troops, as we evolved, our violence can be controlled somewhat. If a troop's leader dies, the troop may break up and probably all its members die. To some extent, chimps know that.
When humans live in huge cities and vast nation-states, the evolutionary controls cease to work. There may or not be any practical solutions. Many wise people, perhaps starting with Freud in 1930, have suggested that we have less than a century to live as a species.
No "we".....because all of us who are horrified and are asking these questions are human. It is "they" who are not of human consciousness who are solely capable of such atrocities. They are not us, and they are not like us; this is why we cannot comprehend their depravity. We are incapable of it, because we are not like them. We are human. They are not.
"If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being".
No, I truly believe it is an alien consciousness, similar to what Rudolph Steiner described when he talked about "archons". Not of Earth; a parasitic galactic race that originated far from Earth.
Hey Dr Kay whilst I agree it’s true that there are many millions of good people, but I think in this conversation the 'we' is the generic name for our human species. 'We' globally have developed and accepted the use of the most powerful and terrifying weapons. The mindless consumption of our planet's resources has led us into a global climate catastrophe.
The ironic thing is that these destructive behaviors are not due to individual 'evil' politicians' policies or business leaders hell-bent on profiteering from death, but billions of everyday non-evil people just getting on with their lives.
Could we be at an evolutionary crossroads? We have never had this level of destructive power. Maybe all emerging life in the universe must evolve past the weapon phase or disappear altogether.
“We have never had this level of destructive power.”
This is true.
If the Roman Empire had developed and deployed nuclear weapons, we probably wouldn't be exchanging messages on Substack.
Our destructive power has evolved over time commensurate with our technological advancements and our psychological development, all driven by our fear of the miracle of creation, and our quest for immortality.
In the last of his seminal books, "Escape from Evil," a piercing psychological analysis of human aggression, American cultural anthropologist Ernest Becker writes:
“Because he [man] knows he is mortal, the thing he wants most to deny is this mortality. Mortality is connected to the natural, animal side of his existence; and so man reaches beyond and away from that side. So much so that he tries to deny it completely. As soon as man reached new historical forms of power, he turned against the animals with whom he had previously identified—with a vengeance, we now see, because the animals embodied what man feared most, a nameless and faceless death.”
This is something I have been exploring over the years.
For more info, check out my post: "We Are Not Animals!"
I think one of the major problems confronting us as a species is the exponential increase of our intellectual development, particularly in the field of technology while our moral development is left far behind. We have little sense of ourselves as part of Nature, rather we see the world around us as a resource to be mined, controlled and modelled by us. We generally take whatever we think we need from our planet, dump toxins of all sorts with little or no consideration for the effects on other people, life forms or ecosystems. We think it’s all about us and that we are entitled to anything that makes life easier or more pleasant for us. We think we are the centre of everything. Humankind driven by Neoliberalism and Capitalism has become a giant destructive force.
We have for the most part lost the capacity for awe unless it’s at our own “achievements” ( I use the word advisedly).
The genocide in Gaza shows how much we care about other humans. What hope then for anything else?
We need to realise not just mentally but deep in our hearts that we are all interconnected, not just with each other but with all life.
Our incredible high tech weaponry shows more than anything else what a backward, self destructive and intellectually limited species we are.
Seriously, my brother. If that’s the worse shade of evil that you’ve shed on the world, I am (with your permission) submitting your name as a candidate for Pope. Given the questionable track record of the last Pope, you will definably top the list of most qualified.
Having traveled to Libya several times myself in the 4 years prior to the NATO regime overthrow, I can certainly vouch for the general impression of security and well-being in the country. Blair & co certainly have a lot to answer for but probably never shall face judgement elsewhere than in hell.
Can you say more? I'd be interested to hear what your take is on the present state of Libya. What is the general mood of the people? Is their a lot of crime and corruption? Do people still talk about Gaddafi? If so, what is the general consensus?
Unfortunately not because we were scheduled to fly out the day war broke out. However, news of people we knew in the Akakus had not been good, with tourism income wiped out and a constant danger of armed marauders with no government to speak of. Basically, Syria as it is today 😔
But that will be the worst judgement anyone can get, falling into the hands of an angry God. I believe they will experience the pain of each one of their victims. An eye for an eye..
Bashar al Assad was not laughing at Leader Al Qaddafi. He was laughing in agreement with him. Al Qaddafi was like an uncle to Bashar and his brothers from a young age; Syria and the Libyan Jamahiriya maintained close relations and Libya even entered into a federation/unity attempt with Syria in the 1970s. After the speech, al Assad (who was the host of the Arab League Summit that year in Damascus) thanked al Qaddafi for his "clear, poignant, and pertinent truths". Both were opposed to the Iraq war, supported Iraqi insurgency, and were working to push for a boycott/blockade against "Israel" at the Arab League Summit but were rebuffed by the traitors and collaborators present there. Libya left the Arab League, and Syria was expelled not long after.
Martyr Al Qaddafi simply had a most unique, blunt, informative, and simultaneously humorous method of communication. Since he was not a head of state or holder of office, but the 'leader of the revolution' after relinquishing all official power by 1976 (when Libya transitioned from a Republic to the world's first Jamahiriya, or direct democracy 'state of the masses'), he was not constrained by the decorum of the rest of the suit-wearing technocrats.
An official attending the Arab League Summit once said, "al Qaddafi is the voice of every Arab on the street. He says what we all believe in our hearts, but are unable to say because of our diplomatic positions."
Thanks for your response and for taking the time to share your thoughts. It’s very much appreciated.
If Syria and the Libyan Jamahiriya maintained close relations, it was not evident in Gaddafi’s 2008 Arab Summit address. At that summit Muammar Gaddafi’s exact words were:
“I'm not talking about the policies of Saddam Hussein or the disagreements we had with him. We all had disagreements with him, and we have such disagreements among ourselves here. We share nothing beyond this hall.”
Gaddafi didn’t say, some of us share nothing beyond this hall, or—except for Bashar al Assad, I share nothing with you beyond this hall.
Your comment stated: “After the speech, al Assad (who was the host of the Arab League Summit that year in Damascus) thanked al Qaddafi for his "clear, poignant, and pertinent truths.”
If you would, please provide me with direct source information documenting al Assad exchange with Gaddafi at the summit, and any additional information regarding their relationship.
If I somehow misinterpreted Bashar al Assad laughter, or the context of their relationship, I am open to new information based on hard facts.
Thank you for your article about the reality of life in the Jamahiriya and the vicious zio-imperial assault against the great and revolutionary nation. Al Qaddafi was a leading advocate and supporter of liberation movements across the world, and his whole life (before the Arab League Speeches and UN address) was dedicated to fighting zionism, imperialism, and apartheid on every continent. "Wherever you find a righteous struggle, you will find Libya's hand on its shoulder."
Bashar al Assad was laughing throughout the speech. I am personally also overcome by laughter, in agreement and admiration for the man's principles and brilliance, while listening to him speak. Al Qaddafi's statement about not sharing anything beyond the hall was general talk about Arab disunity, not a specific comment about Syria or any other state. Libya had closer relations and more shared policies with Syria than any other Arab state, in the 70s and in 2008/2011 as well. Pam-Arab Nationalist, socialist, Nasserite underpinnings of both states. One can find old photos of Bashar as a child playing with Saif Al Islam Qaddafi and both of their brothers, with Hafez al Assad and Muammar al Qaddafi smiling on. Libya fought alongside Syria against the "Israelis" and their proxies throughout the Lebanese crisis. Both were the patrons of similar Palestinian guerrilla factions, namely PFLP-GC.
The statement I referred to was from an Algerian diplomat, I believe it was at the end of an NYT article. I'll share it with you once I can retrieve it. Al Assad's remarks praising al Qaddafi's words after his address can be found on longer recordings of al Qaddafi's address, lengthier recordings of the summit, and the contents of al Assad's own address to the Summit. His thoughts of al Qaddafi's speech can also be inferred from Syrian policy regarding Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, and "Israel", which were almost in complete alignment with Libya's.
I don't blame you at all, most folks (after the recent resurfacings and popularization of the clip) see irony in it, especially after the zio-imperial war against Syria and al Assad's fate December 8th. Al Assad himself since his ascendence to Presidency in 2000 made similar warnings to al Qaddafi at the Arab League, defended Iraqi sovereignty, and opposed Arab League traitors who supported the zio-imperial "Crusade" and sanctions against Iraq. He was well aware of being included in the "Axis of evil", and the "Israeli" neocon desire for war against Syria to follow immediately after Iraq.
One more angle to consider is OPEC's overproduction of oil and the price of oil around 2011. OPEC overproduced by 4-5 million barrels of oil per day, which roughly equates to what Iraq and Lybia could have produced if they weren't rendered conflict zones. Saudi Arabia and some others benefited from the high price of oil and overproduced regularly to make up for Lybia and Iraq underproduction caused by their conflicts.
If Iraq and Lybia were not conflict zones their supply would have hurt that bonus profit for the Saudis and others, and would have dropped the price of oil to $90 or less per barrel of oil, from the ~$110 dollars per barrel it was.
The Arab League nations such as the UAE (a GCC nation and Saudi little brother) sponsored both sides in the Lybian conflict. It seems clear they benefitted from and sppnsored the conflict, and so I can only conclude they wanted it.
This doesn't seem like a story of who's next. It seems like a story of betrayal. The Palestinian cause is another story of betrayal, as the Arab cousins turn their backs on their murdered family.
Your point is well taken. Yes, Gaddafi was definitely betrayed. I also think he understood this. He knew that many in the Arab League had strong economic and technological ties to the west, especially the United States.
It was US oil technology that allowed the Saudis to tap into their rich oil reserves and prosper. In return for US military protection and advanced weaponry, the Saudis agreed to trade oil only in US dollars, something that is rapidly changing with the rise of BRICS.
Gaddafi had little in common with his so-called Arab brothers who—as you pointed out—benefited from NATO’s aggression and destruction of Libya. Hence his “any of you may next” warning.
It seems the text to voice feature is turned off. I'm a subscriber on the website, but I use Substack in order to listen to the long articles. It's very helpful. Will it work if I also subscribe to the Substack?
Well, I’d be happy to help pick up where he left off. But I don’t know where to gun for: open discussions about it with the African Union or the Sahel Confederacy.
Libya had high literacy, no homelessness, good national health and everybody had a home. The reason why they did the Arab spring there is because libya wanted to use a gold African currency not the petro dollar.
Thank you for an excellent article detailing the truth about how America under Obama/evil Hilary Clinton massacred 1 million Iraqis and murdered a the most loved African leader, Gaddafi and completely destroyed the sovereign country of lybia. As long as the two war-mongers the US and Israel under Netanayu exist, there will never be peace and prosperity in Africa. Dr Rapiti
Dr. Rapiti,
Thanks for your comment and accurate assessment regarding peace, which never seems to be the goal for America and their NATO allies.
In his opening statement at the United Nations, Muammar Gaddafi was gracious enough to congratulate and welcome Obama to the General Assembly, acknowledging his African heritage and referring to him as “our son.” Two years later Obama—a bonified globalist stooge—ordered an attack on the sovereign nation of Libya. The rest, as they say, is history.
Gaddafi’s exact words:
“In the name of the General Assembly, at its 64th session, presided over by Libya of the African Union, of 1,000 traditional African kingdoms, and in my own name, I would like to take this opportunity as President of the African Union to congratulate our son Obama because he is attending the General Assembly, and we welcome him as his country is hosting this meeting.”
Make that 3 million Iraqis. At least. Not counting the maimed, bereaved, and those rendered homeless and stateless. Or the almost total destruction of the infrastructure.
An inconvenient truth as war crime after war crime fomented by forces of the ‘democratic’ west spread their ‘peace’ across the globe.
Well stated.
I often ask myself—exactly who are we as a species and where is this all heading?
I fear that "we" as a species are killer apes. I mean that literally. In small troops, as we evolved, our violence can be controlled somewhat. If a troop's leader dies, the troop may break up and probably all its members die. To some extent, chimps know that.
When humans live in huge cities and vast nation-states, the evolutionary controls cease to work. There may or not be any practical solutions. Many wise people, perhaps starting with Freud in 1930, have suggested that we have less than a century to live as a species.
No "we".....because all of us who are horrified and are asking these questions are human. It is "they" who are not of human consciousness who are solely capable of such atrocities. They are not us, and they are not like us; this is why we cannot comprehend their depravity. We are incapable of it, because we are not like them. We are human. They are not.
If only that were true - but it is not.
"If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being".
-Alexandr Solzhenitsyn (“The Gulag Archipelago”)
No, I truly believe it is an alien consciousness, similar to what Rudolph Steiner described when he talked about "archons". Not of Earth; a parasitic galactic race that originated far from Earth.
Hey Dr Kay whilst I agree it’s true that there are many millions of good people, but I think in this conversation the 'we' is the generic name for our human species. 'We' globally have developed and accepted the use of the most powerful and terrifying weapons. The mindless consumption of our planet's resources has led us into a global climate catastrophe.
The ironic thing is that these destructive behaviors are not due to individual 'evil' politicians' policies or business leaders hell-bent on profiteering from death, but billions of everyday non-evil people just getting on with their lives.
Exactly
Who amongst us hasn’t had unspeakable thoughts of evil? This is an inescapable part of the human condition.
“… to the degree that you condemn others, and find evil in others, you are to that degree unconscious of the same thing in yourself.”
Allen Watts On Carl Jung and The Philosophy of Good and Evil
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRuYkGDtwiA&list=PLLK1-Uu9ov82ADGSBlAGe8W-rvxC7cjOz&index=11
Not sure about the unspeakable thoughts thought FtS, mean ones maybe 🤔
Baz,
You mean to say that you never had existential thoughts of cleaning someone’s clock?
C’mon, man. Even Mother Teresa carried a stiletto …. :)
My guess is extinction.
Could we be at an evolutionary crossroads? We have never had this level of destructive power. Maybe all emerging life in the universe must evolve past the weapon phase or disappear altogether.
“We have never had this level of destructive power.”
This is true.
If the Roman Empire had developed and deployed nuclear weapons, we probably wouldn't be exchanging messages on Substack.
Our destructive power has evolved over time commensurate with our technological advancements and our psychological development, all driven by our fear of the miracle of creation, and our quest for immortality.
In the last of his seminal books, "Escape from Evil," a piercing psychological analysis of human aggression, American cultural anthropologist Ernest Becker writes:
“Because he [man] knows he is mortal, the thing he wants most to deny is this mortality. Mortality is connected to the natural, animal side of his existence; and so man reaches beyond and away from that side. So much so that he tries to deny it completely. As soon as man reached new historical forms of power, he turned against the animals with whom he had previously identified—with a vengeance, we now see, because the animals embodied what man feared most, a nameless and faceless death.”
This is something I have been exploring over the years.
For more info, check out my post: "We Are Not Animals!"
https://followthesilence.substack.com/p/we-are-not-animals
✌️
Learned much from your We are not animals post - were you aware comments are turned off for it?
NO I WAS NOT! Thanks for the heads up.
I must have klutzed out an selected the wrong button. :)
🙏
Comment to follow…..😉
I think one of the major problems confronting us as a species is the exponential increase of our intellectual development, particularly in the field of technology while our moral development is left far behind. We have little sense of ourselves as part of Nature, rather we see the world around us as a resource to be mined, controlled and modelled by us. We generally take whatever we think we need from our planet, dump toxins of all sorts with little or no consideration for the effects on other people, life forms or ecosystems. We think it’s all about us and that we are entitled to anything that makes life easier or more pleasant for us. We think we are the centre of everything. Humankind driven by Neoliberalism and Capitalism has become a giant destructive force.
We have for the most part lost the capacity for awe unless it’s at our own “achievements” ( I use the word advisedly).
The genocide in Gaza shows how much we care about other humans. What hope then for anything else?
We need to realise not just mentally but deep in our hearts that we are all interconnected, not just with each other but with all life.
Our incredible high tech weaponry shows more than anything else what a backward, self destructive and intellectually limited species we are.
I agree entirely with your thoughtful assessment Francesca - thanks for sharing.
Oh, I thought only people who loved hierarchical, patriarchical systems and who believed in sky fairies and loved dressing up could apply.
😂
Is that some weird euphemism? Or is ‘clock cleaning’ worse than I thought.
Seriously though I can’t say I’ve ever had any properly evil thoughts, worse they probably get, faking being fouled in the penalty area.
WHAT? FAKING BEING FOULED IN THE PENALTY AREA?
OMG, HOW COULD YOU??
Seriously, my brother. If that’s the worse shade of evil that you’ve shed on the world, I am (with your permission) submitting your name as a candidate for Pope. Given the questionable track record of the last Pope, you will definably top the list of most qualified.
🙏
Having traveled to Libya several times myself in the 4 years prior to the NATO regime overthrow, I can certainly vouch for the general impression of security and well-being in the country. Blair & co certainly have a lot to answer for but probably never shall face judgement elsewhere than in hell.
Thanks for your response.
Can you say more? I'd be interested to hear what your take is on the present state of Libya. What is the general mood of the people? Is their a lot of crime and corruption? Do people still talk about Gaddafi? If so, what is the general consensus?
🙏
Unfortunately not because we were scheduled to fly out the day war broke out. However, news of people we knew in the Akakus had not been good, with tourism income wiped out and a constant danger of armed marauders with no government to speak of. Basically, Syria as it is today 😔
But that will be the worst judgement anyone can get, falling into the hands of an angry God. I believe they will experience the pain of each one of their victims. An eye for an eye..
Bashar al Assad was not laughing at Leader Al Qaddafi. He was laughing in agreement with him. Al Qaddafi was like an uncle to Bashar and his brothers from a young age; Syria and the Libyan Jamahiriya maintained close relations and Libya even entered into a federation/unity attempt with Syria in the 1970s. After the speech, al Assad (who was the host of the Arab League Summit that year in Damascus) thanked al Qaddafi for his "clear, poignant, and pertinent truths". Both were opposed to the Iraq war, supported Iraqi insurgency, and were working to push for a boycott/blockade against "Israel" at the Arab League Summit but were rebuffed by the traitors and collaborators present there. Libya left the Arab League, and Syria was expelled not long after.
Martyr Al Qaddafi simply had a most unique, blunt, informative, and simultaneously humorous method of communication. Since he was not a head of state or holder of office, but the 'leader of the revolution' after relinquishing all official power by 1976 (when Libya transitioned from a Republic to the world's first Jamahiriya, or direct democracy 'state of the masses'), he was not constrained by the decorum of the rest of the suit-wearing technocrats.
An official attending the Arab League Summit once said, "al Qaddafi is the voice of every Arab on the street. He says what we all believe in our hearts, but are unable to say because of our diplomatic positions."
Thanks for your response and for taking the time to share your thoughts. It’s very much appreciated.
If Syria and the Libyan Jamahiriya maintained close relations, it was not evident in Gaddafi’s 2008 Arab Summit address. At that summit Muammar Gaddafi’s exact words were:
“I'm not talking about the policies of Saddam Hussein or the disagreements we had with him. We all had disagreements with him, and we have such disagreements among ourselves here. We share nothing beyond this hall.”
Gaddafi didn’t say, some of us share nothing beyond this hall, or—except for Bashar al Assad, I share nothing with you beyond this hall.
Your comment stated: “After the speech, al Assad (who was the host of the Arab League Summit that year in Damascus) thanked al Qaddafi for his "clear, poignant, and pertinent truths.”
If you would, please provide me with direct source information documenting al Assad exchange with Gaddafi at the summit, and any additional information regarding their relationship.
If I somehow misinterpreted Bashar al Assad laughter, or the context of their relationship, I am open to new information based on hard facts.
Thanks again.
Peace, good health, and kind regards.
🙏
Thank you for your article about the reality of life in the Jamahiriya and the vicious zio-imperial assault against the great and revolutionary nation. Al Qaddafi was a leading advocate and supporter of liberation movements across the world, and his whole life (before the Arab League Speeches and UN address) was dedicated to fighting zionism, imperialism, and apartheid on every continent. "Wherever you find a righteous struggle, you will find Libya's hand on its shoulder."
Bashar al Assad was laughing throughout the speech. I am personally also overcome by laughter, in agreement and admiration for the man's principles and brilliance, while listening to him speak. Al Qaddafi's statement about not sharing anything beyond the hall was general talk about Arab disunity, not a specific comment about Syria or any other state. Libya had closer relations and more shared policies with Syria than any other Arab state, in the 70s and in 2008/2011 as well. Pam-Arab Nationalist, socialist, Nasserite underpinnings of both states. One can find old photos of Bashar as a child playing with Saif Al Islam Qaddafi and both of their brothers, with Hafez al Assad and Muammar al Qaddafi smiling on. Libya fought alongside Syria against the "Israelis" and their proxies throughout the Lebanese crisis. Both were the patrons of similar Palestinian guerrilla factions, namely PFLP-GC.
The statement I referred to was from an Algerian diplomat, I believe it was at the end of an NYT article. I'll share it with you once I can retrieve it. Al Assad's remarks praising al Qaddafi's words after his address can be found on longer recordings of al Qaddafi's address, lengthier recordings of the summit, and the contents of al Assad's own address to the Summit. His thoughts of al Qaddafi's speech can also be inferred from Syrian policy regarding Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, and "Israel", which were almost in complete alignment with Libya's.
I don't blame you at all, most folks (after the recent resurfacings and popularization of the clip) see irony in it, especially after the zio-imperial war against Syria and al Assad's fate December 8th. Al Assad himself since his ascendence to Presidency in 2000 made similar warnings to al Qaddafi at the Arab League, defended Iraqi sovereignty, and opposed Arab League traitors who supported the zio-imperial "Crusade" and sanctions against Iraq. He was well aware of being included in the "Axis of evil", and the "Israeli" neocon desire for war against Syria to follow immediately after Iraq.
One more angle to consider is OPEC's overproduction of oil and the price of oil around 2011. OPEC overproduced by 4-5 million barrels of oil per day, which roughly equates to what Iraq and Lybia could have produced if they weren't rendered conflict zones. Saudi Arabia and some others benefited from the high price of oil and overproduced regularly to make up for Lybia and Iraq underproduction caused by their conflicts.
If Iraq and Lybia were not conflict zones their supply would have hurt that bonus profit for the Saudis and others, and would have dropped the price of oil to $90 or less per barrel of oil, from the ~$110 dollars per barrel it was.
The Arab League nations such as the UAE (a GCC nation and Saudi little brother) sponsored both sides in the Lybian conflict. It seems clear they benefitted from and sppnsored the conflict, and so I can only conclude they wanted it.
This doesn't seem like a story of who's next. It seems like a story of betrayal. The Palestinian cause is another story of betrayal, as the Arab cousins turn their backs on their murdered family.
Josh,
Your point is well taken. Yes, Gaddafi was definitely betrayed. I also think he understood this. He knew that many in the Arab League had strong economic and technological ties to the west, especially the United States.
It was US oil technology that allowed the Saudis to tap into their rich oil reserves and prosper. In return for US military protection and advanced weaponry, the Saudis agreed to trade oil only in US dollars, something that is rapidly changing with the rise of BRICS.
Gaddafi had little in common with his so-called Arab brothers who—as you pointed out—benefited from NATO’s aggression and destruction of Libya. Hence his “any of you may next” warning.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
🙏
It seems the text to voice feature is turned off. I'm a subscriber on the website, but I use Substack in order to listen to the long articles. It's very helpful. Will it work if I also subscribe to the Substack?
I'm not sure. I have yet to explore Substack's the text to voice feature but will be looking into it.
Thanks for your input.
🙏
I think a united Africa and Arabia are great things for the world.
Absolutely.
Well, I’d be happy to help pick up where he left off. But I don’t know where to gun for: open discussions about it with the African Union or the Sahel Confederacy.
They anally raped him with a knife. Sounds like an Israeli prison or something.
Libya had high literacy, no homelessness, good national health and everybody had a home. The reason why they did the Arab spring there is because libya wanted to use a gold African currency not the petro dollar.
As if new needed more confirmation that the U.S. government is the most evil government on earth
One would think. Unfortunately many people are still sleepwalking, hesitant to wake up and smell the coffee.
✌️
Chad
Notice, Gaddafi wanted his own gold backed currency! Notice, Germany wanted its own central bank! Could it be, bankers are the sons of the Elohim?